CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIC AND NUTRIEN REMOVAL ON LOOP BIOFILTER SYSTEM FOR PEAT WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Abstract
Domestic wastewater pollution in the watershed area which has ecologically sensitive area, such as peat water, can be resolved by water management that combines raw water treatment and wastewater treatment with closed loop system on a community scale. This paper describes the removal characteristics of organic and nutrient in biofilters loop system to treat raw water that contains color <300 units PtCo, COD 102-116 mg/L, and domestic wastewater. Water treatment system which consists of a biological treatment and multimedia filtration is used to supply drinking water and to conduct wastewater treatment on a community scale by using the potential of ecosystems and chemical-physical characteristics of peat. The study was conducted by applying method of field scale to serve 50 families and method of performance evaluation models based on approach of first-order kinetics plug flow and Kadlec and Knight k-C* model. The case study is located in downstream of Siak watershed areas, as one of the national strategic watersheds, which is packed with urban slum areas with low access to surface water utilization and good sanitation infrastructure. Water treatment unit that consists of peat biofilter systems, hybrid aerobic biofilter, and zeolite cation-anion filtrationcan support water supply in public sanitation facilities. The biofilters loop model for wastewater treatment consists of hybrid Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB), biofilters, and constructed wetlands which its media is a combination between porous media and peat soils. At steady state, the removal of organic and nitrogen is larger than 90%.
Keywords
References
Alcamo, Joseph. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington: Island Press.
Ayati, B., and H. Ganjidoust. 2006. “Comparing The Efficiency of UAFF and UASB With Hybrid Reactor in Treating Wood Fiber Wastewater.” Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering 3 (1): 39–44. http://ijehse.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jehse/article/view/69.
Daigger, Glen T. 2008. “New Approaches and Technologies for Wastewater Management.” The Bridge 38 (3): 38–45.
Eckenferlder, W. 1989. Industrial Water Pollution Control. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://bases.bireme.br/cgi-bin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/?IsisScript=iah/iah.xis&src=google&base=REPIDISCA〈=p&nextAction=lnk&exprSearch=100319&indexSearch=ID.
Eddy, Metcalf &, Franklin L Burton, H David Stensel, and George Tchobanoglous. 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. McGraw Hill.
Effendi, Hefni. 2003. Telaah Kualitas Air, Bagi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Dan Lingkungan Perairan. Kanisius.
Forsberg, Curt. 1998. “Which Policies Can Stop Large Scale Eutrophication?” Water Science and Technology 37 (3). Elsevier: 193–200.
Headley, Tom R. 2006. “Suitability of Peat Filters for On-Site Wastewater Treatment in the Gisborne Region.” New Zealand.
Herlambang, Arie dan Nusa Idaman. 2010. “Penurunan Kadar Zat Organik Dalam Air Sungai Dengan Biofilter Tercelup Struktur Sarang Tawon.”
Kadlec, R H, and R L Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Baca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kelly, Carrie. 2006. Stormwater Treatment Areas: Experiences with Nitrate Removal. Florida Port St. Lucie: Department Environmental Protection.
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 2009. Status Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia. Jakarta.
Mara, Duncan. 2013. Domestic Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries. Routledge.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 38 Tahun 2011 Tentang Sungai. n.d.
Philip, Ralph, B Anton, and P der Steen. 2011. “SWITCH Training Kit.” Integrated Urban Water Management in the City of the Future. Module 1.
Reed, S.C. 1993. Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment, A Technology Assessment. USEPA.
USEPA. 2004. The Guidelines for Water Reuse. Washington.
Zouboulis, Anastasios I, Xiao-Li Chai, and Ioannis A Katsoyiannis. 2004. “The Application of Bioflocculant for the Removal of Humic Acids from Stabilized Landfill Leachates.” Journal of Environmental Management 70 (1). Elsevier: 35–41.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/widyariset.3.1.2017.55-66
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Widyariset

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed by :